jocab hornberger

What about the excess — that is, the amount by which the amount collected exceeds the amount paid? Don't look there for hope or for some of your “I put it in” money. The government spends that excess as part of its general welfare-state expenditures. In return, it inserts government “IOUs” into the so-called Social Security fund. What that means is that federal officials are promising to pay the Social Security money back, with interest, that they are spending. 

The entire Social Security scheme is a lie and a fraud of monumental proportions — and has been since the very beginning. If someone in the private sector tried something like this, he'd be serving a long sentence in a federal penitentiary.Let's divide Social Security recipients into two categories — those who truly depend on the government's largess and those who don't because they are already sufficiently wealthy. Those who aren't financially dependent on Social Security could be cut off immediately. If people wish to make a donation to someone who is financially well off, they can do that privately and voluntarily. 

The implicit reason, according to the bureaucrats, is that Americans cannot be trusted to voluntarily help their parents. That is, if Social Security taxes were abolished, children would sooner let their parents die in the streets than voluntarily help them out. Or to put it another way, only bureaucrats, not regular people, can be trusted to help people in need, albeit with money extracted from regular people through the force of the IRS.  

The argument of the social security is a continuation of america's premier socialists program and that american's can be trust to take care of themselves or parents. Thats wProxy-Connection: keep-alive
Cache-Control: max-age=0

t makes social security a transfor program intend of a retreatment program.